Page:Thesaurus Palaeohibernicus 2.djvu/107

61

Glosses on Priscian (St. Gall).

uitium¹³ uidear facere, intel­lectus tamen permanet¹⁴. Conso­nantibus autem sic cohaeret, lit huiusdem^[1] penitus sub­stantiae sit¹⁵, ut si auferatur, signifi­cationis uim minuat prorsus¹⁶, ut si dicam ‘Cremes’ pro ‘Chremes.’ Unde hac consi­derata ratione¹⁷ Graecorum doctis­simi singulas¹⁸ fecerunt eas quoque literas¹⁹, quippe²⁰ pro τͱ θ, pro πͱ φ, pro κͱ χ scri­bentes. Nos autem antiquam scrip­turam seruamus²¹. In Latinis tamen²² dicti­onibus^[2] nos quoque pro ph coepimus f scribere…nisi quod…est aliqua in pronun­tiatione²³ huius literae

P. 9b

differentia cum sono¹ ph.

ρͱ autem ideo non est translatum ab illis in aliam figuram² quod³ nec sic cohaeret huic quomodo mutis nec, si tollatur, minuit signifi­cationem⁴. Quamuis enim subtracta aspira­tione dicam ‘retor,’ ‘Phirrus’ intel­lectus intiger manet⁵, non aliter⁶ quam⁷ si ante­cedens uocalibus⁸ auferatur, unde osten­ditur ex hoc quoque aliqua esse cognatio r literae cum uocalibus. Ex quo⁹ quidam dubita­uerunt utrum praeponi debeat huic aspiratio an subiungui. Unde Aeoles loco, ut diximus, aspira­tionis digamma^[3] ponentes in dictio­nibus ab ρ

13: tredígbáil tinfeth14: incoissig afolad cétnae15: conid­hinunn folad dóib16: ní inchoisig inson afolad cétne—.i. in­choisged riam^[4]—iarṅdígbail intinfith17: dlúthe intinfith donaib ɔsonaib18: oéndai oenlitre dodénom díb hiscríbunt19: cárachtra na conson ⁊ intinfeth20: indemin21: híscríbiunt dá­carachtar beos .i. carachtar ɔsine ⁊ carachtar tinfith amal dondgnítis sengreic · ʼ22: ciaforcomamni riagoil sengrec hiscríbunt inda caractar isnaib ɔsonaib ucut^[5] ro­ċruthaig­semmar^[6] camaiph immurgu oen cháractar ·f· tarhesi ·p· cotinfeth inepertaib latinṅdaib^[7] · ⏑23: hifogur

P. 9b

1: hifogur2: ɔṅdenta^[8] óentorand tarahesi^[9] amal naheliu3: ol 4: sluindid afolad cétnæ5: issed afolad cétnae sluin­ditae6: níntṡain^[10]7: oldaas8: ar9: huadligud in­choibnis

13. through taking away the aspiration.14. it signifies the same substance^[11].15. so that they have the same substance.16. the sound does not signify the same substance—i.e. which it signified previous­ly—after taking away the aspi­ration.17. the closeness of the aspi­ration to the conso­nants.18. single, that single letters should be made of them in writing.19. the charac­ters of the conso­nants and the aspi­ration.20. certainly.21. in still writing two charac­ters, i.e. the character of a consonant and the character of aspi­ration, as the ancient Greeks used to do.22. though we preserve the rule of the ancient Greeks in writing the two charac­ters in yon conso­nants, we have, however, formed one character—f instead of p with aspi­ration—in Latin words.

P. 9b

2. so that one figure should be made instead of this, like the others.4. it expresses the same substance.5. it is the same substance which they express.8. from.9. from the principle of the affinity.

1. leg. eiusdem
2. MS. add. uel nothis
3. MS. digammae
4. this part of the gloss is over the other
5. cf. Sg. 202^b 3
6. the aspiration is irregular
7. i.e. latindaib
8. ṅ is over the line
9. MS. tarhesi
10. ṡ is over the line
11. for the technical folud ‘sub­stantia,’ ‘signi­ficatio’ cf. Sg. 3^a 2, 9^a 12, 15, 16, 9^b 4, 5, 25^b10, 17, 26^b 9, 12, 27^a 3, 6, 8, 16, 27^b 9, 28^a 1, 2, 28^b 5, 19, 20, 22, 30^a 5, 17, 39^b 8, 45^b 1, 7, 61^a 4, 71^a 1, 72^b 5, 73^a 15, 73^b 3, 4, 7, 75^b 6, 150^b 2, 189^b 6, 189^b 10, 197^a 1, 200^b 4, 5, 211^a 9, 211^b 3, 5, 7, 212^b 8; cf. secundum sensum, hoc est secundum substan­tiam quali­tatis, Ars Anonyma Bernensis, Suppl. Gramm. Lat. p. 64