p. 198b quemadmodum in primitiuis. Extrinsecus uero' terminatio distingiiit numerum, quomodo et genera et casus possessionum ; in quibus regula eorum consequentiam seruat mobilium nominuml Quaeritur^ cur 'nostras' et 'uestras' a plurali tantummodo numero diriuantur? Ad quod respondendum, quod patriam seu gentem significant. . . Et 5 possessiua quidem egent adiunctione nominum ad plenam significa- tionem*, primitiua uero non semper. Itaque perfectnm ad discre- tionem est...deficiens uero"* quantum ad discretionem... Cum igitur et articuli relationem et pronomen relationem habent, bis eundem ad cognitionem referri ostendunt^ Nee mirum, loco 10 articulorum ea nos accepisse in declinatione, cum apud Graecos (i. p. 582) quoque hisdem uocibus et in articulis et in pronominibus solent uti^ 09 ij o, ex quibus apud nos 'hie haec hoc' nascuntur pronomina articularia^ ...o 6/1,09* 8ovo<i^, id est 8ovX6<; /jlov^... ...possessiua uero transitiua'" sunt semper... ...uocatiuum non 15 habet aliud pronomen nisi secundae personae primitiuum, 'o tu,' ' o uos/ et primae possessiuum, quando ad secundam transit personam ".
...tamen possunt in tertia simul utraque inueniri in diuersis'...
...'sui'...non solum tunc refertur ad tertiam personam, quando 20
1. .i. alleith atraib 2. A.fodalet chenel fochosmaUius anman
nadiecht - 3. .i. nied im'tnafoichsom hie • cid ariidid hiiathuisMh
ildaih disruthaigedar'^ acht isciall indildatad ind atraih file inddib cid
arna airecht pronome?? naitrebthach dia slund in othuth • - 4. do-
linad anintliuchta 5. ind insce 6. .i. biet dd atarcvd and «5
ams. Hodain diambe articol 7 pronomen and • olsodin mmurgu nad
recar les • 7. .i. arberat pronomen asanartocol son dm 8. .i.
geinengraicichthe .i.fobith ite nodaengraicigetar • 9. .i. aitrebthach
conartucol fil hie • 10. dondatrub 11. .i. intan aspersan
tanaise atrebthar and 3°
1. acht ropat mini tertpersin
!• i-6' *^^ ^^6 P^*"^ ^^ possession. 2. i.e. they distinguish gender
like nouns adjective. 3. i.e. it is not this that he asks here : why
are they derived from plural cases? but it is the sense of plurality of
possession that is in them, why was not a possessive pronoun invented to 35
express it in the singular 1 i. to complete their sense. 5. the word.
G. i.e. there will be two anaphoras there in that case if there be an
article and a pronoun there : which however is not needed. 7. i.e.
they make a pronoun out of their article indeed. 8. i.e. the origin of
taking place, i.e. because it is they that take their places. 9. i.e. a 40
possessive with an article there is here. 10. to the possession.
11. i.e. when it is the second person that is possessed there.
